Saving…a dying art

When I was young, we saved everything—the last blob in the peanut but­ter jar, the rub­ber bands on the news­pa­per, TV din­ner trays, S & H stamps, even alu­minum foil (if it was clean). We did that because: a) we might need it again; b) it was waste­ful not to; and c) chil­dren in India were starving.

This penu­ri­ous upbring­ing has had an effect on my entire life. I’m still try­ing to decide if it’s more pos­i­tive or neg­a­tive. There’s ambi­gu­i­ty about who coined the phrase “Waste not, want not”, but I know that my moth­er wore it out. I was taught that buy­ing some­thing used was just as good (if not bet­ter) than buy­ing new because it was less expen­sive, usu­al­ly worked just as well, and extend­ed the use­ful­ness of the item. Wear­ing hand-me-downs was a giv­en. (My sis­ter, a mil­lion­aire, still shops in thrift stores.) On some lev­el I thought of our fam­i­ly as less fortunate.

Then came the dawn of the age of recy­cling, and sud­den­ly I was in the van­guard. I was no longer poor, I was eco­log­i­cal (what a love­ly word!). Good­will stores and garage sales became hip. Used became vin­tage. We start­ed brag­ging about how many miles we put on that ol’ car. Trash had val­ue. I remem­ber tak­ing my kids and three garbage bags of alu­minum cans to the recy­cling cen­ter and get­ting our $7.75, usu­al­ly spent on ice cream or can­dy on the way home. For awhile, we even had one of those can crush­ers in our garage.

Alas, the Age of Recy­cling has passed as quick­ly as the Age of Penury. We have entered into a new era: the Con­sumer Econ­o­my. By buy­ing, we are help­ing every­body. (Then why is the gap between the 1%’ers and the rest of us grow­ing ever larg­er?) New is always bet­ter than used. (A per­son­al con­flict of mine: if I buy my favorite author’s book used, he doesn’t get a pen­ny of that, does he?) As we are mak­ing Amer­i­ca great again, our recy­cled catch­phrase is: You get what you pay for. Our cred­it his­to­ry is more impor­tant than our car­bon foot­print. We judge on exter­nals: our looks, our cars, our hous­es, our jobs, our edu­ca­tion, our social media presence—apparently, only God looks at the heart any­more. Our lead­ers bury their heads and talk about tax cuts instead of cli­mate change. The world of com­merce has dis­cov­ered an entrance into our pri­vate lives and is learn­ing how to manip­u­late from within.

To inter­rupt my own rant: there are tons of peo­ple all over the plan­et who are ded­i­cat­ing them­selves to com­bat­ting the ills that are beset­ting our world. I read about it, I see it on TV, I observe it in my church, and I hear about it every day from the peo­ple I meet and know and talk to. The world needs more of these people—there can’t be enough.

I believe there is a call to save the plan­et. It’s not new; it is age­less. But the call is rever­ber­at­ing in these times, and the peo­ple are grow­ing, in num­bers and in wis­dom. One of the keys is sav­ing: lives and resources and goods and nature. The result of not sav­ing is waste. The symp­toms of waste are: excess (always have more than you need) – the land­fill­ing of Amer­i­ca – the plas­ti­ciz­ing of our oceans – China’s refusal to take our trash (they’ve got enough of their own) – the shrink­ing of our resources – the despoil­ing of our pub­lic lands – the cheap­en­ing of qual­i­ty – per­son­al bank­rupt­cy (finan­cial, moral, spir­i­tu­al). That’s quite a rap sheet.

I’m not hope­less, but I’m wor­ried. Do we enjoy a bet­ter qual­i­ty of life than our par­ents? Most of us would say yes. Do our chil­dren enjoy a bet­ter qual­i­ty of life than we did? Life expectancy—certainly; contentment—not so much. I’d prob­a­bly split that one half and half. Will my six grand­daugh­ters enjoy a bet­ter qual­i­ty of life than I do? I want to believe it, but I don’t. Not unless we make Amer­i­ca green again. The bot­tom line of sav­ing: it is a req­ui­site of pre­serv­ing our planet.

Leave a Reply

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *